Jump to content

nachomario

Members
  • Content count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About nachomario

  • Birthday February 5

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Suggestion Name: Loading screen suggestion Suggestion Type (Rank, Vehicle, Menus, Regiment): Menus Reason (Why would you like this added/removed): I think a new loading screen would benefit the server, as it would make it seem more interesting for the players joining. (Not gifs or Music) As I was unable to access the previous loading screen, this loading screen still needs to have information about the server to be placed on it - etc colossal gaming top left and server info bottom right. Attached is original files used for the image as well as the image itself so that you can make certain changes to it. (Note: I used gimp to make this, and so you will be able to make changes to the image using the gimp xcf file itself, or export it to a photoshop compatible file) Screenshots (Optional): colossalloadingscreen.xcf
  2. Nah it states in the (updated) rules that a raid must be called over comms. This rule tends to trip up a few people I notice.
  3. He stated "in the past week" so I assume he meant 4 days ago, this october, and simply got the month wrong.
  4. This is mainly a solution to making the glitch itself easier to solve, the fact that taliban don't die when trying to fix it is a part of it. Also during a US raid like half of the US in the raid got killed by Tali gate. I think another solution to this would be getting another gate altogether.
  5. I had multiple problems while typing this, as whenever I try to select a space it selects a letter instead so when I tried to type it deleted my letters.
  6. Steam ID:STEAM_0:1:101570756 Steam Community Profile Page Link: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198163407241 Current In-Game Alias (E.g.Captain Deston): Tal Commander Nachomario Most Commonly Known Alias (E.g. Deston): Nachomario How much game time do you have? (Provide proof): I had hundred and hundreds of hours although on the jungle map I had noticed that my hours had been reset. However, I still have 270 hours from gametracker. On garrys mod I have over 2000 hours (if the question required that). What is your current rank in-game (e.g.: User, Bronze, Gold, ect)? : Guest On a scale of 1 to 10, how well are you known throughout the community by both players and staff members?: For active members and admins probably an 8, due to how many hours I played throughout the last holidays, and on average, and the number of tickets I made asking for a car. Are you currently in the Colossal Gaming Steam group?: Yes, I joined it 3 maps ago in 2017. Do you follow and enforce the server rules to the best of your ability?: Yes, I have put in lots of effort trying to learn about all of the vague rules, the unexplained rules and the very specific ones which aren't mentioned on the tab menu. When I notice that someone is breaking/ about to break a rule etc solo raiding/ rdm, I ask them why they did it (in case they have a valid defense) and if they deny breaking it while I witnessed it, then I use !ticket make a ticket about them. I am forgiving for players who just made a mistake and apologise etc I would tell an admin to not give a warning to a player who RDMed me because they had mistaken me for a known Taliban, however if they continue to act in a rule-breaking way after receiving a verbal warning about not doing something, then I would seek to give them further punishments etc demote. Do you understand that Colossal server(s) are to be monitored sensibly and your duties are to be taken seriously at all times: Yes I do, I know that if I just start vote kicking people randomly that that would be total abuse of my power and I would deserve to lose it/be blacklisted. I intend to only use any power if completely necessary, and all admins are afk. Have you had any bans to date? If so, please explain to us why we should still accept you: No Bans on this server. (However, there was this one gmod server which, after I joined, I got an insta perma-ban.) Questions In One Paragraph, Please Describe your personality and speak a little about yourself: I always try to follow the values about what I think is right and I think that it is important for me to know everything about the rules and gameplay of the server, as this will help me to make a formal suggestion (which is easy for any reader to understand) about the flaws I notice about them, and then a solution for it which has the upsides and downsides of the suggestion. Then after this, I think that it is important to take other people's opinions about my solution into consideration, as they will allow me to either tell them why they are invalid, or use their valid points to update any suggestions to make them more suitable. I do occasionally make mistakes, etc when I am not focused on my argument, or in a reasonable mood. When I do make a mistake I think that it is important for me to admit that what I said was a mistake, as this will prevent me from digging a deeper hole for myself and damaging my reputation. I think that as long as I follow good morals and am always honest I will always be learning about better morals to follow, and anything bad that I do will likely just be a mistake or a misjudgement in the way I go about things, and admitting to these will always help me improve and not make them again. In One Paragraph, Please explain why you would like to obtain the rank of Respected I have played this server so often that it has become like a passion project for me, as I enjoy learning about how it works so I can give feedback about it to make it better. I would like the respected rank because it would allow me to be recognised as a player who takes the server seriously, and who puts in effort to help make it a better and more enjoyable place for all of the players.
  7. Suggestion Name: Taliban door fix Suggestion Type (Rank, Vehicle, Menus, Regiment): Map Addon Pack (Optional): N/A Addon Pack File Size: N/A Reason (Why would you like this added/removed): Because when the doors to Taliban base break, they are really hard to fix. Suggestion: I suggest that the admins make it to that the 2 middle parts of each of the 4 gates are permanently deleted. This will result in a few things happening: The Taliban gates will be more likely to become out of sync due to it being less likely to kill any Taliban who are in its path. As there are now only two entities that need to be in sync instead of the included middle parts, it will be extremely easy to fix if they become out of sync. This is because as there is no chance of the Taliban dying, all they need to do to fix it is stand in the way-stopping one gate from opening and as soon as the other closes-pressing the button, making the two gates in sync. While this will make the gates easier to go out of sync, there will be no chance of random middle parts, and it will be so easy to fix that any player could do it in less than 10 seconds without any risk of them dying. Screenshots (Optional):
  8. OK. What I am saying is that there is a rule preventing this from happening, which is the rule which I have stated should be written down. This rule hasn't been written down yet which is why I think that as it is an applicable rule, therefore, it should be written down in the tab rules under "General Rules". Also, I think that the rule stating that entering US/Tali base should be considered a raid as it is another rule which hasn't been written down yet.
  9. Do you think that someone should be warned for pulling out a gun while an armed member of the opposite faction was behind them and looking at them? There isn't a rule allowing you to break "fearrp" in this scenario, so any rule that defends players who have no idea they are under fearrp would be appreciated. However, I do see the downside as some players may turn their back intentionally on US for 4 seconds as an excuse to pull a gun, but at that point it is obvious that they know a US is there. Also if on [the fearrp breaker's] screen a rock is blocking the taliban/US he does need to wait 4 seconds before pulling a gun, so a scenario where he manages to break fearrp without making it obvious he saw the US/taliban is hard for me to imagine. I would appreciate a solution to this in the rules as any compromise between the possible abuse from fearrp breaker would be great, as aren't you already allowed to pull a gun to kill an unarmed US/known Tali if you don't spot the other US/tali hidden in the bush aiming his gun at you? I think a rule stating this would just help clear things up, as it wouldn't make things any easier to abuse than they are already are for the people who know this rule.
  10. Also, a new General Rule should be added stating that you shouldn't stand on other player's heads, as this is failrp. This is because to some players this rule isn't clear enough.
  11. Suggestion Name: Written Rule Fixes Suggestion Type (Rank, Vehicle, Menus, Regiment): Menus Addon Pack (Optional):N/A Addon Pack File Size: N/A Reason (Why would you like this added/removed): Because some written rules need to be added while others need to be changed. Anti-Spamming rules to be added: No mic/OOC spamming - I think that these are treated as rules, so they should be written down in the tab menu. Fearrp rules to be changed: Fearrp should add a rule saying that you aren't kos if you don't see the member of the opposite faction with a gun pointed at you. Fearrp rules should be taken out of taliban rules and General fearrp rules should remove "and players involved are within yelling distance". Fearrp rules in "General Rules" should remove any issues caused by this change by adding "fearrp applies when a member of the opposite faction points a gun at you or you are being arrested". The reason I am making this suggestion is because I was warned for following the general rule of "players involved are within yelling distance". When I argued about it with the admin he said that I should've ignored the rule because "Taliban Army Rules" don't say specifically to do this, and therefore I should follow "Taliban Army Rules" over "General Rules" even though Taliban rules also don't say that you aren't under fearrp when you have a gun out and an armed US spots you, or that you aren't under fearrp if you don't see the us spot you." I have 2 arguments about why it is wrong, and why I made the suggestion. If the Taliban rule was to be followed over the general rule, then shouldn't the general Fearrp rule be put in the US rules instead of general rules? If this is the case, why is it that US shouldn't be under fearrp when someone out of shouting distance points a gun at them, while taliban who literally have a weapon that kills themselves ARE under fearrp when a US out of shouting distance points a gun at them. Thats why I think that a solution would be to add the taliban fearrp rule to general rules as suggested above, as well as to completely remove the general rule saying that they aren't under fearrp when they are out of shouting distance, and to add a rule saying you arent under fearrp if you have no idea you are threatened. PS: I would really appreciate it if you posted your thoughts about this in the replies. Screenshots (Optional): N/A
  12. I apologise for my last response as I wrote it on a tablet and I wasn't thinking about the entire argument as a whole. I was unfocused on what I was typing, so I am sorry for my message which I regret typing. However, that being said here is my current opinion: You were permabanned for 3 reasons, so I will go over the reasons and my thoughts about each one, before a conclusion about them. RDM: I don't think that RDM by itself is worthy of a ban, or anything more than a kick, while I do think that multiple RDM would be a few days of ban. Disrespect: I do agree that this sort of behaviour that you have shown is the type of behaviour which can add toxicity to the server, and which I believe you have, however it is not the type of behaviour which by itself will result in rules being broken so I don't think that this would be worthy of a ban. No intent to RP: I think that when you received the perma-ban for this reason, that it was fair. However, you have really been putting a lot of effort into your ban appeal and trying to convince us to let you play again on the server, and to RP. This shows that you not only have the intention to RP, but are determined to be able to RP again, and I am sure that this reason is no longer a valid reason for your ban. I think that as you were banned a long time ago, the ban from those two first reasons should have expired by now, and you should be allowed to play on the server (with much more severe consequences/punishments for rules like these being intentionally broken again). So overall, a +1 for you to be unbanned.
  13. sorry, i was kinda in a rush and clicked send before voicing my full opinion. I will be back in a few hours to talk more on it.
  14. "Not lash out at people"-for bringing up valid points about you? "it was a meme"-What do you mean by this? that you joked about hacking? you sorted out your ddos threats with feralswan? then why are you banned? Minging is more than a "somewhat" valid points, as it decides whether you are serious about contributing to the server, or you are just treating the server like a "meme" I suggest that you find a different enjoyable server to meme/spend your time on instead of trying to get back onto this one, which you obviously don't take seriously. However, I do think that you could be given another chance, as you do seem motivated to get back onto the server, which hopefully means that you will try harder to not break any rules.
×